“He descended into Hell.”
This line is sometimes omitted from the Apostle’s Creed (or added to it, depending on your perspective) in its section on Christ. How are we to understand that short period of time between Jesus’ death and resurrection? Why is this ill-described moment in history so important that it is built in to the confessions of the ancient Christian Church and many modern iterations of the same? Why do we make such a big deal of something about which Scripture is relatively silent? I will begin my reflections here the same way they germinated in my mind.
It started one recent Sunday at church. The president of a Christian college in Uganda spoke during the service. He is a self-described evangelist, and I found in his preaching a sense of urgency. I did not realize that I had missed it. Growing up a Baptist in South Carolina, one would expect a preacher to have a little bit of “fire” in his sermon. Up here in New England, I have noticed that this style of preaching is equated to unnecessary theatrics and a provocation of a forced emotional state. Perhaps this is just my experience, but it seems to be true!
Back to my Ugandan Brother. He spoke of the East African Revival and it’s key marks, personal repentance and holiness. I wondered what contributed to that sense of urgency and why I did not see it as much here in New England. One could presume that it is because he is more accustomed to coming face to face with death; a kind of liveliness that results from “fearing the One who can destroy both the body and the soul.” It got me thinking about the Wisdom Literature in Scripture that recounts the merits of musing on death. Here in the U.S.A., we value youth and immortality so much that as a culture, we shy away from and outright hide anything that resembles feebleness or death. Is that why there is not so much urgency to prepare for the possibility of life after death? Is that why the demographics are what they are in the U.S. churches? (I truly wonder why my mind gets so distracted on these tangents. I promise to get to where I’m going.) One way or another, my thought process shifted to why we fear death and how we understand (or fail to understand) death. Should we be more urgent in addressing life? Should we be more urgent in addressing death?
As I noted in an earlier post, I paused when I read an exposition on the third article of the 39 Articles of Religion. Specifically, I was struck by The concept of how Jesus Christ died for our sake and descended into Hell. At this point, I was intrigued. I began reading as many commentaries and expositions as I could get into my hands. How could he have done anything after death and before resurrection? He was dead, right? What do we know about death, anyway? What is so important about it that I need to consider it?
In search of an answer, I go first to the beginning. Genesis states that God created everything good. If I am paying attention, I can confess that life is good. Adam and Eve were placed in Eden, and they were warned not to eat the fruit of a certain tree. With that command, God said in Genesis 2:17, “but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.” God’s command states plainly that the day they ate of it, they would die. Because of this, I can safely assume that death is a bad thing. Yet, Adam and Eve ate of that tree, and they lived long enough to have at least three children, seeing at least two of them grow old enough to have professions. Genesis 5:5 even states that Adam lived 930 years. I am left befuddled as I try to understand death in these introductory chapters of the Bible.
In my attempt to make sense of the scene, I presume that Adam and Eve died spiritually the day they ate of the tree. Their physical death was stalled due to the loving graciousness of their Creator. My conclusion includes a division of death into spiritual and physical. This would allow for Christ’s physical death at Golgotha and his being spiritually present in Hell, doing some work. While it does not get me any closer to understanding death, it provides a very fragile framework. On its own and without any further explication, this is heretical territory, and I do not want to be here. The greatest problem is having a Christ who does not fully participate in our suffering.
Allow me to explain why this is dangerous. If in Adam, all humanity is spiritually dead, yet Christ lived spiritually after physical death, descending into Hell, then as far as I can tell, Christ did not experience spiritual death as we experience it. This provides a Christ who did not fully experience the current, fallen human experience, keeping him from fully redeeming mankind from our experience. If Scripture teaches a division of death into physical and spiritual, I need to either uncover more truth from Scripture or divest myself of some presuppositions. Perhaps I need both, but I believe this is an appropriate starting point.
One thing is certain: more study is needed. First Corinthians 15 testifies that while the first Adam brought death, the second Adam (Christ) became a life-giving Spirit. Perhaps this is where I should turn next in my search to understand death, Christ’s descent into Hell, and why death should be such an urgent matter.